<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>google+ &#8211; John Large &#8211; Technology, Hardware,Web Development, Digital Privacy &amp; Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.johnlarge.co.uk</link>
	<description>I&#039;m a Computer science academic, working towards a PhD. I&#039;m researching digital privacy &#38; ethics. I also run a busy e-commerce business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6164056</site>	<item>
		<title>Fighting for a fairer internet</title>
		<link>https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/fighting-fairer-internet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Large]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/?p=1896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the internet and more importantly the business model of the internet. It is becoming more apparent that the current business model of the internet is broken. A handful of adverting companies now control all advertising revenues online &#38; this has led to companies like Google &#38; Facebook monopolizing [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the internet and more importantly the business model of the internet. It is becoming more apparent that the current business model of the internet is broken. A handful of adverting companies now control all advertising revenues online &amp; this has led to companies like Google &amp; Facebook monopolizing both the revenue streams and the access to content.</p>
<p>Google &amp; Facebook are now seen as the major sources of online traffic. Google monopolises search, while Facebook monopolises information aggregation and links. Google’s business model is one of algorithms and control of search, with a natural bias towards paid links through their AdWords advertising programme. Over at Facebook we have a similar issue with their latest algorithms and the promotion of paid content &amp; burying of non-paid content.</p>
<p>Now, this is where it becomes a problem. These two companies aren’t in control of the internet as such, but they have become the defacto portals, the first port of call for anyone searching for information. They have become the default access points for information and produce a funneling effect. This means that information isn’t shared in a fair or democratic way, it all depends on how deep your pockets are &amp; how much you are willing to spend on advertising.</p>
<p>Then we arrive at the situation we are in right now in 2017. Elections &amp; referenda have been won &amp; fingers are pointing at Facebook &amp; online targeted advertising. The proliferation of fake news spread via Facebook, and the political parties both home &amp; abroad who are paying to influence electorates and buy influence are also in the spotlight.</p>
<p>It’s the political which has brought this to the attention of the general public, but the same thing is happening on the broader internet. Small companies are unable to compete fairly online with large companies, uber is under the spotlight for undercutting on price and legal breaches, amazon is changing high streets the world over. A few massive companies are having a profound effect on our societies and most of us turn a blind eye for convenience or low prices.</p>
<p>I’ve owned a small business for 10 years selling online &amp; every year it gets harder to sell &amp; more expensive to advertise. Until 2012 we had no paid advertising and all of our traffic came from organic searches spread across Google, Yahoo, MSN and various other search providers. Today, we spend around 25% of our monthly turnover on advertising with Google and still barely make enough money to pay us a wage. AdWords keeps getting more expensive &amp; conversion ratios keep getting worse. But we have no choice as Google essentially spams their search results with paid adverts before a user even finds the organic hits. Google have cannibalized their competitors and 97% of all search traffic comes from them to our site.</p>
<p>We are approaching a point in time where a few mega companies are controlling not the information online, but the access to it. You may have an amazing blog or website, but if people can’t find it, you can never establish your readership &amp; expose readers to new content. Yet those who can afford it can buy clicks &amp; in turn influence.</p>
<p>The problem is not limited to buying clicks. It’s getting harder to make any money from your own content. The injustice is that the content that google make money off with their AdSense programme, and the revenue Facebook makes, comes largely from user-generated content. We write the blog posts, we create the Instagram’s, the Facebook posts (well I no longer use the platform, but millions do) and so on. We spend time creating content and sharing it. Meanwhile Facebook inject adverts into streams of posts, or amongst legitimate Instagram’s &amp; pay you nothing. AdSense allows publishers to show adverts, but often they aren’t relevant to the content of the website &amp; they pay very little money.</p>
<p>The balance of power has shifted from the content to the platforms. Without our websites and blogs, our news sites and our photography, google wouldn’t have a search or advertising business. Without our photographs and writing, Facebook &amp; instagram wouldn’t exist &amp; certainly wouldn’t be profitable. Yet they make all of the money and claim it’s in return for giving you access to the platforms. The data they mine off you is valuable enough, but then they advertise to you relentlessly.</p>
<p>Google’s dominance of advertising online has led a lot of really good websites to haemorrhage money while still trying to produce content. Advertising revenues for content creators are hard to make a living from, yet we create all of the value with our words, our videos and our pictures.</p>
<p>The need to try to make the internet pay for writers &amp; creators has led us down a dark path. News websites &amp; creators now refer to their work as ‘content’. It has been cheapened to a quantity over quality model, and current world events highlight this perfectly.</p>
<p>Fake news makes its authors money, but lacks all credibility and is usually complete fabrication. These elaborate stories garner clicks &amp; create profit. The more outrageous, the more likely it will be shared on social media and the more it makes. The injustice being this rubbish content is normally really popular &amp; profitable while exceptionally well researched &amp; written content remains hidden.</p>
<p>Visit YouTube and checkout the video titles. Click bait is king, the content is falling by the wayside. YouTube personalities will even publish videos saying they have nothing to make a video about, or asking for video ideas. Seriously?</p>
<p>Blog posts with catchy titles and no substance (cue the comments section on this post), Instagram’ers advertising the latest slimming tea or watches, the content is created for the sole purpose of making ad revenue clicks, not for the value in the content itself. An Instagram of a watch is no different from an advert of a watch, it’s just stealth advertising, not a valuable contribution to your body of work.</p>
<p>Hopefully, one day soon, we can return to an internet which isn’t governed by these advertising behemoths. I’m working on a way to help us get there &amp; will share more about that soon. You are probably wondering what you can do to help?</p>
<p>From a search point of view, why not try a different search engine? There are loads to choose from and you might just enjoy being exposed to new content. If you must use google, try to avoid the paid advertising and aim for the organic hits. This should help promote the production of great content over spammy content.</p>
<p>If you must use Facebook, make sure you use the share button sparingly. Concentrate on the valuable content created by your friends &amp; family, don’t contribute to it being a massive billboard &amp; news farm.</p>
<p>With regards your favourite websites, why not support them by sharing their stories. Pass on your favourite blogs or websites to friends or family &amp; help out your favourite creators. If you see a relevant advert on these websites, check them out. It might pay them enough to grab a coffee and to write their next awesome article. Some blogs &amp; websites will even allow you to chip in a few quid to help pay their bills. If you value the work, do consider doing so.</p>
<p>Try to ignore the live news feeds and un-researched news articles which come out constantly. Look for well written articles, long reads and proper investigative journalism. A lot of the non-paywall news websites have become content farms, desperate for clicks. This can make them a little like Alice down the rabbit hole. They can steal hours if you aren’t careful (sidebar of shame springs to mind). I’ve even taken to paying for my news from The Guardian &amp; The Times. Good content deserves funding, and sometimes exposure to adverts is costlier than ethically funding your favourite writers.</p>
<p>If you run a website, try to keep control of your content. Why post pictures to instagram when you can post them on your website, why write epic posts on Facebook when you could self publish them. Build something for yourself &amp; stop funding the platforms. The internet needs more self hosted work &amp; less &#8216;platform content&#8217;.</p>
<p>I could write for hours about these topics. The commodification of the internet and our content is a massive bugbear. We, the creators, the writers, the photographers and poets, we create the wealth on the internet. Without our words, our videos, our songs, our art the internet is a connection of computers, nothing more. We all need to realise that we are the value creators &amp; the mega monopolies are the parasites. They sell our work and don’t pass along the profits.</p>
<p>Keep creating &amp; keep fighting for a fairer internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1896</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality is dying &#8211; but not in the way you might think</title>
		<link>https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/net-neutrality-dying-not-way-might-think/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Large]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2017 12:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/?p=1713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Net Neutrality is&#160;defined as &#8220;the principle&#160;that Internet service providers and governments regulating the Internet should treat all data on the Internet the same, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or mode of communication&#8221;. While many attacks have been made on Net Neutrality by large corporations, including [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Net Neutrality is&nbsp;defined as &#8220;the principle&nbsp;that Internet service providers and governments regulating the Internet should treat all data on the Internet the same, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or mode of communication&#8221;. While many attacks have been made on Net Neutrality by large corporations, including trying to create a two tier internet &amp; ISP&#8217;s slowing the traffic of competing streaming services, on the whole the basic definition of Net Neutrality has remained unscathed. However the definition of net neutrality may just be out of date.</p>
<p>As I see it, net neutrality is already dead. While it may be possible for anyone to create a website or web content &amp; share it with the rest of the world, we have reached a point where a handful of gatekeepers restrict access to that content through their ubiquity &amp; their algorithms.</p>
<p>Take my website for example. The vast majority of my traffic, more than 90%, now comes from google organic search. Only 5 or 6 years ago I would receive traffic from MSN (now bing), Yahoo, AOL, Ask and a plethora of other search engines. I would get hits from DMOZ and other directory sites &amp; I would get lots of links from other blogs and websites.</p>
<p>Today, the majority comes from Google. Google has become the defacto search engine &amp; this is a direct challenge to Net Neutrality. For one, algorithms cater all of your searches to you. This may sound wonderful, but it creates millions of separate filter bubbles. Before google made the algorithm changes that catered search results based on your own activity, a website would climb the ranks based on real world popularity. If you had an amazing blog post or popular webpage it would be promoted up the rankings for all users, regardless of their own browsing habits. This produced a genuine meritocracy in search &amp; every website had its chance to shine, given the content was good.</p>
<p>A few years back, content was ranked based on how many other people linked to it &amp; how authoritative it was deemed. This system could be gamed, but on the whole it worked very well. Around 2012 Google started to make changes. Probably due to the introduction of the Chrome web browser, Android phones and chrome books. Users started to integrate their online lives with Google. A google account was required for Youtube &amp; Gmail and a whole host of their services. At this point, google had the perfect way to start slurping up all of your browsing data, all of your email contents, your google+ posts, your hangouts &amp; messages. This allowed for specific catering of search results &amp; pretty much ended authoritative content on google. This shift to locking users into google services was the first step of the major tech companies in shutting down net neutrality in a new way. It&#8217;s no good having great content if Google deems it of no use. This could have huge implications. Think political, social and corporate interests.</p>
<p>Google have made themselves the internet (and not just google, between google, facebook, twitter, instagram &amp; spotify there isn&#8217;t any room for competition). By making themselves the first port of call for most web users, they have become the gate keepers. The judges of quality, the architects of our information.</p>
<p>This problem is further compounded by Google&#8217;s advertising model. My browser is very secure, I use Ghostery, Adblock &amp; Privacy Badger to block as many trackers &amp; adverts as possible. My search looks very different to that of most regular users, see the screenshots below.</p>
<figure id="attachment_1715" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1715" style="width: 478px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-1715" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.05.34.png?resize=478%2C965&#038;ssl=1" alt="Google with adblock" width="478" height="965" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.05.34.png?w=478&amp;ssl=1 478w, https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.05.34.png?resize=149%2C300&amp;ssl=1 149w" sizes="(max-width: 478px) 100vw, 478px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1715" class="wp-caption-text">Google with adblock</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_1716" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1716" style="width: 648px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-1716" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.12.png?resize=648%2C753&#038;ssl=1" alt="Google without adblock - above the fold" width="648" height="753" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.12.png?resize=881%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 881w, https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.12.png?resize=258%2C300&amp;ssl=1 258w, https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.12.png?resize=768%2C892&amp;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.12.png?w=908&amp;ssl=1 908w" sizes="(max-width: 648px) 100vw, 648px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1716" class="wp-caption-text">Google without adblock &#8211; above the fold</figcaption></figure>
<figure id="attachment_1717" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1717" style="width: 738px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-1717" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.20.png?resize=648%2C873&#038;ssl=1" alt="Google without adblock - below the fold" width="648" height="873" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.20.png?w=738&amp;ssl=1 738w, https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-02-at-12.10.20.png?resize=223%2C300&amp;ssl=1 223w" sizes="(max-width: 648px) 100vw, 648px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1717" class="wp-caption-text">Google without adblock &#8211; below the fold</figcaption></figure>
<p>As you can see from the above example, searching for badges on Google, in the top screenshot I&#8217;m given search results which aren&#8217;t filtered by any factors such as my browsing history, location or email contents. This is as close to how google used to work as possible. Without tailoring of my search results I&#8217;m mostly given the most relevant and best websites. This doesn&#8217;t take into account any blocking from search results google may have done of perfectly relevant content that has been deemed algorithmically unacceptable.</p>
<p>Now the bottom two screenshots tell a different story. That&#8217;s how my search looks when I&#8217;m logged into google &amp; my ad blockers are turned off. They are hijacked considerably by advertising. Paid links. Most of the content above the fold is advertising content &amp; is given more prominence through styling. It urges a user to click the content. This is not democratic. The more you can pay, the more you can sap search traffic towards content which may be incorrect, irrelevant or misleading. If you have the money, you can top all search results.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same below the fold, the bottom of the page is full of advertising and noise, the actual search results get lost amongst the noise. This is another way in which net neutrality is being destroyed. My search here is pretty mundane, just searching for badges in the UK, but imagine it was on searches such as climate change, political campaigns or even denial of events. If you had the bank roll &amp; the manpower, you could top all relevant search results &amp; influence a large part of the debate. Given that Google is now the defacto search engine, you could literally get any story in front of everyone searching a topic. The ability to shape or re-write history is yours if you can afford it. This will have profound effects on politics. We have already seen the power of the internet in politics both in the UK &amp; USA and this will only get worse as people discover the power of the internet, not only to influence, but to avoid scrutiny.</p>
<p>I personally use startpage and duck duck go to search. It is not as convenient as being logged into a google account, but I know the results aren&#8217;t tailored &amp; that my search history isn&#8217;t shaping my view of the internet. I recommend you all consider spreading your search wings &amp; find less intrusive search engines.</p>
<p>Moving on to social media, if it&#8217;s photos you are sharing, you probably use Instagram (Facebook), if it&#8217;s instant messaging &amp; text messaging, it&#8217;s probably whatsapp (Facebook) or Facebook messenger. If you want to share personal thoughts with close friends &amp; family it&#8217;s probably Facebook you are using, and for more generic less personal sharing or professional social media use you probably use twitter. For your video watching, you probably use Youtube (google) &amp; for music, no doubt it&#8217;s spotify.</p>
<p>You can see the issue here, nearly all of our online lives are controlled by a few companies. It is they who decide what we are allowed to see &amp; they who take payment to promote the websites &amp; views of those with the most money. You probably spend the majority of your time flitting between services owned by Facebook, Google &amp; Twitter. This leads to a serious erosion of net neutrality as you are only exposed on the internet to content they see fit &amp; proper (of course unless money is involved, in which case you can buy as many users eyeballs as your funds will allow).</p>
<p>Facebook is a company I have now distanced myself from. I have an&nbsp;empty profile on there &amp; have even blocked access to Facebook urls in my hosts file on my computers. Facebook is the worst example of both data mining of users data &amp; the filter bubble effect. Facebook wants to keep you online &amp; on their platform, be it via a web browser or app. The Facebook feed used to be a basic set of status updates, you could visit &amp; spend 10 minutes catching up with friends &amp; sharing photos. It was a pretty benign service. I now see it as a serious threat to the open internet. Your Facebook feed is now a never-ending, algorithmically generated quagmire of information, all tailored specifically to you. If Facebook knows you are interested in something, it will show you more of that. Lots more of that. It&#8217;s almost impossible to finish using Facebook. All of your likes, all of your comments and all of your activity go towards building a picture of you. They profile every user &amp; compare you to other users. Content other users similar to you like is shown to you. Your bubble becomes smaller and smaller until everybody is exposed only to information which they relate too.</p>
<p>This tailoring of information may sound wonderful if your interest is in something innocent, say kittens or coastal walks, but imagine if your interests are a little more serious. We saw in the UK how Facebook essentially split the country in half. Those of us on the Pro EU side &amp; those on the Anti EU side. Each group were shown more &amp; more information which reinforced their own view, while never being shown the other sides of the argument. This isn&#8217;t debate, it&#8217;s the reinforcement of divisions in society, the reinforcement of prejudices and without neutrality it has got way out of hand. I stopped using Facebook shortly after Jun 2016 after reading more &amp; more about their algorithms &amp; the filter bubbles they create.</p>
<p>As a web developer I can see the engineering thinking behind these algorithms. As feats of&nbsp;engineering they are superb &amp; very accurate, however as someone who studied Web Development in a humanities department back in 2005 I can see that applying only engineering thinking to social platforms is a recipe for disaster. I believe that the referendum in the UK was extra devastating because of social media. Both sides, from what they could glean&nbsp;from their Facebook pages, thought they couldn&#8217;t lose. All of the information they received via Facebook reinforced their own views without ever challenging them. That is not a debate &amp; with such algorithms it will only drive deeper divisions between every niche community in the world. With a referendum or a vote, chances are one side will always lose. It&#8217;s the whole point of putting things to a vote, but social media reinforced to both sides that their argument was beyond question to such an extent that the devastation was even greater for the losing side. And it spills out &amp; has real world effects in society.</p>
<p>As I was saying earlier, I learned Web Development very early on. Back then it wasn&#8217;t really a thing &amp; my degree route was actually called Web Content Management. We did web design &amp; development, but we also did internet law, internet infrastructure, information architecture &amp; information retrieval. We studied web accessibility for disabled users and a whole host of humanities focused modules alongside the technical modules. This gave me a great oversight of&nbsp;the internet, not just from an engineering standpoint but also that of a user &amp; society in general. Back then, you didn&#8217;t google for things, you searched. Youtube didn&#8217;t exist, bandwidth was expensive &amp; videos online kept to a minimum. It was much easier to read genuine fresh content, to learn new things &amp; discover new ideas &amp; ways of thinking. Back then it was a neutral place. Discussions were done on IRC or over instant messaging clients. They didn&#8217;t take place in public. Tweets didn&#8217;t exist &amp; certainly wouldn&#8217;t have been used as authoritative quotes in the media. News wasn&#8217;t broken, it was triple checked, confirmed, edited and then published. We didn&#8217;t use personal information, we used nicknames or handles. We didn&#8217;t share private or identifying information. The net was a better place.</p>
<p>If you wanted to publish ideas, you first had to learn a bit about the internet, almost like getting a license to drive. We had netiquette (if you used ALL CAPS you where very angry). If you wanted to write to your MP, you had to write or email, not just shout abuse at them on twitter.</p>
<p>The internet will always have bias as long as engineers are programming the algorithms, but any tailoring based on your own interests introduces another layer of bias which is not healthy. If you think of a traditional library such as a university library, you would go to the shelves housing the subject you where interested in &amp; every single book on those shelves would carry equal weight. Your selection would be based on reviewing a sample of books &amp; choosing the most relevant. Search engines have taken this away from information retrieval as searches are first skewed by paid advertising, then by algorithms &amp; finally by a users search profile. If you are constantly being shown things you are familiar with and never any variation, you will never develop a rounded knowledge of any subject. Imagine walking into a library &amp; there being salesman pushing their books at you, shouting for your attention, it just wouldn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>I fear for the future of the internet if more people move towards these major tech players. The underlying technology of the internet will probably remain neutral, but if all the portals people use to access the internet are controlled by the likes of Facebook &amp; Google, people will only ever be exposed to the content that is deemed fit. This could lead to major headaches for all democracies. Online electioneering is already beginning, the billionaires are bankrolling the politicians &amp; secretly funding campaigns. They are creating misinformation &amp; fake news is now a thing. They are mining vast quantities of data from social media &amp; targeting users in extremely precise ways online. This funding is known as dark money &amp; as it&#8217;s impossible to keep a track of online ad spending it introduces the ability to win elections by buying influence with unlimited spending. All of this information is ours to give, and modern web users give it freely. That needs to change. Consider your privacy, do you want pictures of your children appearing in advertising because in the terms &amp; conditions you agreed to it states that all content becomes the property of Facebook? I know I wouldn&#8217;t!</p>
<p>So consider your web usage. If a website requires you to sign-up to browse, look for another service. Try some of the different search engines, they may be slightly less convenient, but your privacy is worth much more to you. If you use a Gmail or Hotmail account, remember that your emails are being scanned &amp; used to cater your search results. Always log out of social media &amp; google when not using them. Consider a service such as Proton mail or self hosted email. Don&#8217;t put your most intimate details onto Facebook &amp; twitter. The moment you upload that content you lose control of it. Remember, these services make money from your clicks, they are designed to hold your attention and keep you on their websites. Be careful what you click &#8216;like&#8217; on. Don&#8217;t help them market to you.</p>
<p>Install <a href="https://www.ghostery.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ghostery</a> to stop these companies tracking your movements around the internet. Don&#8217;t rely on Facebook &amp; Twiter for all of your news and facts. Anything that uses an algorithm will never give you balance &amp; will only divide people further.</p>
<p>I intend to write more on this subject. I&#8217;ll address different areas one at a time, but hopefully this post will at least get you thinking. There is a world of wonderful &amp; informative information out there on the Web, don&#8217;t let Google &amp; Facebook hide it from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1713</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dangers of Social Media &#8211; An end to productivity</title>
		<link>https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/the-dangers-of-social-media-an-end-to-productivity/</link>
					<comments>https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/the-dangers-of-social-media-an-end-to-productivity/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Large]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[simple living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cord cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnlarge.co.uk/?p=1313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are going to think I&#8217;m being a complete dick with this post, but stick with it. I&#8217;m not saying that I&#8217;m not guilty of any of the points made (I am), just highlighting them in a way that makes you think. I have been planning this post for a long time &#38; researching these [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You are going to think I&#8217;m being a complete dick with this post, but stick with it. I&#8217;m not saying that I&#8217;m not guilty of any of the points made (I am), just highlighting them in a way that makes you think.</em></p>
<p>I have been planning this post for a long time &amp; researching these issues for many years. Back in 2008/2009 I based my Masters thesis around social media &amp; it&#8217;s uses in a virtual learning environment. After writing 30,000 words &amp; creating my own Social Media platform I realised the many benefits of Social Media when used within a specific context (in this case to enhance University learning). Although I did uncover many drawbacks which at the time (when Twitter was almost new &amp; Facebook very basic) didn&#8217;t seem too grand.</p>
<p>Roll on 7 years &amp; social media has become an everyday part of our lives. I for one used to love Twitter, to be able to interact with your peers &amp; the people you looked upto. It used to be a great place, a place of enlightenment and learning. Now it has gone the way of many great tools &amp; become the place to air your dirty laundry or advertise your latest product.</p>
<figure id="attachment_1314" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1314" style="width: 576px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-1314" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IMG_5062-576x1024-1.jpg?resize=576%2C1024" alt="My Social Media Account" width="576" height="1024" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IMG_5062.png?w=576&amp;ssl=1 576w, https://i0.wp.com/www.johnlarge.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IMG_5062.png?w=169&amp;ssl=1 169w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 576px) 100vw, 576px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1314" class="wp-caption-text">My Social Media Account</figcaption></figure>
<p>Social Media seems to be intertwined with daily life in 2015. It creates anxiety when people don&#8217;t have access to it. Conversations which used to be between friends at face to face meetings or over an instant messaging conversation/email/text/call are now conducted in the public arena. People are putting their entire life on display &amp; it&#8217;s creating some interesting issues for society.</p>
<p>Instagram is a platform I used to enjoy. To see interesting things my friends had found, nice sunsets &amp; new additions to well-known places. Now it&#8217;s the preserve of the narcissist &amp; the self editors. We use it to present our best selves, perfectly edited &amp; staged to make it look like our lives are perfect &amp; wonderful. This may be all well &amp; good, but when you are living your daily life (which tends not to be some amazing daily adventure) and you are bombarded with images of great restaurants, beautiful cityscapes, 1st class travel, gorgeous people wearing fabulous clothes, it does tend to make you feel a little inferior. This self editing has led to a climate of jealousy &amp; insecurity. It&#8217;s plain to see with our young adults who try to always present themselves immaculately for every occasion. Roll back to when I was 16 and I had no money, grunge inspired jumpers with holes in &amp; the best friendship group you could imagine. We also went on adventures &amp; have such epic stories to talk about to this day.</p>
<p>This insecurity can manifest itself in many ways &amp; I myself (who should know better) have even experienced it. Perhaps you feel you should have a better job, your car is a bit crappy, all of your friends &amp; peers are doing well while maybe you are having a tough time. Rather than bringing people together, social media is breaking people apart. A sort of competitive instinct has developed where you aim to show you are doing better than your peers, simply by getting better instagrams, showing flashier venues or nicer vistas. It&#8217;s all fake.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same story with Facebook. People use that not as a social media platform to keep up with close friends, but as a platform to vent their political/social/personal desires &amp; frustrations. Every time I go on Facebook to check if I&#8217;ve had a message from one of my friends (I have friends dotted around the globe) I find myself looking on with sheer disbelief. People are either having intimate exchanges (between partners) in public instead of between themselves, or they are venting their latest political or personal vendetta and sometimes generally being bigoted and racist. It&#8217;s a completely pointless platform now. Facebook is the platform I hate most. They hide content from people I actually know &amp; show me conversations between someone I know &amp; someone I don&#8217;t. POINTLESS! They also introduced that idiotic share button, so everyone&#8217;s feed is now full of pointless crap. They have made it so people don&#8217;t use the internet, they just use Facebook. One finely tuned propaganda &amp; marketing machine. Oh, and they censor posts (You can&#8217;t type the word Tsu for example, because you may be linking to the social media network tsu.co which pays users for the advertising they see). Unethical.</p>
<p>Next we have twitter. This used to be the preserve of the more techie &amp; learned people. This was actually shown in a statistic but I can&#8217;t lay my hands on it right now (google &#8220;twitter users better educated&#8221; and you will see loads of studies). Essentially a study was carried out and University graduates tended to favour twitter over Facebook. Now twitter has become an advertising mecca for brands &amp; self promotion. The interesting tweets get lost amongst the constant crap. Even if you trim your following list you still have promoted tweets to contend with. AD blocking cuts through them but it&#8217;s not the platform it used to be. Remember back in the day when you could text status updates to your twitter timeline? I bet few people remember that.</p>
<p>The social media landscape is now endless. Snapchat, Beme, Instagram, Google+, Pinterest, Tumblr and many more. All of them promoting insecurity &amp; a luxurious, perfect life beyond our reach. Living everyday feeling inferior is a bad place to be. A life lived in the hope of one day living your dream life is a life wasted. Every day is precious &amp; every day helps you build towards your own future, a future mostly dictated by the actions of right now.</p>
<p>I have found myself bowing to the pressure of Social Media. In my earlier posts you can read all about my attempts to live a more photogenic lifestyle (let&#8217;s just say it didn&#8217;t end well). This weekend I made a big change to stem this ridiculous digital &#8216;keeping up with the Jones&#8217;s&#8217;. I switched of the internet. More specifically I switched off all of my social media &amp; notifications on my iPhone. I didn&#8217;t look at it once. My phone remained silent &amp; to one side throughout all of Friday evening while we watched Children in need on the TV. We had fun, we cried, we ate rubbish food &amp; donated. We actually had a really nice evening. I kept this up throughout Saturday &amp; it was bliss. We got load of things done at home and had loads of time to spare. I&#8217;d advise you all to step away from your Social Media accounts during a set time each week. It&#8217;s called a blackout amongst the people who do it. Try an evening, and then a whole day, then who knows. It&#8217;s so liberating.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s all bad, but it is addictive, very addictive. It destroys your productivity too. I used to spend so much time reading content on the internet. Well written content from tech industry folks who I respected. I had a huge list of blogs &amp; sites I&#8217;d go to for information. Nowadays, I tend to click only the links that are distributed on twitter. It&#8217;s bizarre and unhealthy. The internet was a great place before social media. Before baby scan pictures &amp; your pets (I love your children &amp; your pets, but it&#8217;s just not that interesting to the world all the time) the internet was filled with insightful writing &amp; thought-provoking ideas. Now it&#8217;s an adword infested, self promoting pain in the arse which saps more time than I care to admit.</p>
<p>If you turn off your social media notifications on your smartphone &amp; don&#8217;t open your accounts on your computer I guarantee it will give you anxiety. If I ask you to turn off your phone completely while we have a conversation, you will find a million reasons why you need to be reachable via phone. You don&#8217;t, if it&#8217;s an emergency (which it rarely ever is), someone knows where you are &amp; can find you. I find the Smartphone has ruined old-fashioned face to face conversations with your friends. Checking your phone whilst taking to someone is like saying &#8220;I&#8217;m interested what you have to say, so long as a better offer doesn&#8217;t come up on my phone, so I&#8217;ll be checking that now and then to see if anyone more interesting is speaking to me&#8221;. The Smartphone infuriates me. It&#8217;s become such a vital part of daily life but such a burden in the process.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guilty of most of the things I&#8217;ve talked about, but I&#8217;m working hard to take back my time &amp; my social relationships with people. I&#8217;d rather meet you face to face for a proper catch up that I&#8217;ll remember, and I&#8217;d rather be interested in hearing all of your stories directly. I hate the &#8220;Oh, I saw you did that on FB/Twitter/other pointless platform&#8221; response. It kills conversation dead.</p>
<p>This is just the start of a series of posts I&#8217;m going to do on cutting the cord with social media. I&#8217;ve still not covered click-baiting, armchair activism, bullying &amp; all the other wonderful things that Social Media easily allows. I&#8217;m not trying to suggest it&#8217;s all bad, it&#8217;s just becoming noisy. It&#8217;s less of a useful tool &amp; more of a way to keep us distracted &amp; entertained. As this isn&#8217;t an academic paper &amp; I&#8217;m sure most people have stopped reading by now, I&#8217;ll leave it at that. I&#8217;d love to hear your comments on this though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.johnlarge.co.uk/the-dangers-of-social-media-an-end-to-productivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1313</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
